Fire in the Church by Kurt Fredrickson - A Literary Review
I am doing a number of literary reviews these days for some research that I am undergoing. While you won't be able to check some of the pages I reference, I think you will gain much from the many quotes I mention. Let me share with you how I go about my literary review.
LITERARY REVIEW
I basically start with my sense of the author's thesis, followed by a general overview of the book, and then I focus on themes that are pertinent to my research. With that said, here is my review of this most excellent paper.
THESIS
Kurt Fredrickson’s thesis for Fire in the Church: Organic Structures for the Missional Congregation is that structure matters. If the church moves from an old mechanistic model to a living systems model, she will be able to create better environments necessary for the missional church to thrive.
GENERAL OVERVIEW
The question that Fredrickson is addressing is: How do church leaders foster proper environments so that the Spirit of God can set the church on fire anew (5)? He address this question by taking a look at our current postmodern context, especially as it relates to the shift from classic science to new systems science. This shift is from a mechanical approach to life to an organic approach. After explaining the nature of living systems science, he considers how to apply living systems theory to the church. He insists, “Only as the church has an adequate understanding of its identity and its core practices, is the church able to move forward in new shapes” (55). He then concludes by exploring how to nurture an atmosphere of missional imagination in light of new understandings of organizational theory.
THOUGHTS TO CONSIDER
This research paper is rich in content, with seven helpful figures that summarize important concepts (Pgs. 19,20, 41, 44, 45 and 52). The following are some statements that seemed vital to remember. In section one: “This new systems understanding sees the world more as decentralized than centralized, more networked than hierarchical, more organic than fixed. It is not random and disorganized; it is rather organized through an understanding of complexity and emergence. This new understanding of structures offers new possibilities for ecclesial organization.” (10) “Because we think and behave differently in this information based networked society, we must rethink the way our organizations are structured.” (14) “Structure affects function. Structure is not neutral. The challenge for the church is to imagine new forms and structures for church that will be able to more vitally carry the message of the gospel affecting transformation in people and societies” (21). One way to do this is through reverse assumptions (21).
Statements from section two include: In regard to relational principles in living systems theory: All living things have innate intelligence (30); Life is profoundly interconnected (30); Information brings change (32); Systems interact with their environment leading to adaptive challenges and emergence of new forms of organization (33); and living systems continue to multiply or reproduce (34). “We do not create new structures as much as we create environments and the possibilities of relational connections so that new structures might emerge” (36). “Our ecclesial practices (new ecclesial structures) must emerge from primary Christological and ecclesiological understanding always mindful of the environment in which is the church is located” (37).
In sections three and four: “Structures that are not suitable are stifling and deadening. Structures that are appropriate bring life and vitality” (43). The mental framework transitions necessary in the church: “Radical individualism – wanderers to pilgrim; Aimlessness – busyness to vocation; Consumption – consumers to practioners; Fragmentation – individuals to community; Forgetfulness – amnesia to memory (64).
















Recent Comments